Instructions:
Indicate the actions made by the vulnerable user just prior to the crash based on verbal or physical evidence, but not on speculation alone.
Definition:
The action of the vulnerable user immediately prior to the crash and an indication of whether the vulnerable user was walking/cycling to/from school.
Rationale:
By collecting the actions and circumstances prior to the crash, this element is important for developing more effective roadway design and operation, education, and enforcement measures to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists and prevent crashes with motor vehicles.
FAQ
What if ‘walking, running, or cycling’ and ‘entering or crossing location’ both apply?
‘Entering or crossing location’ takes precedent because this value helps to illustrate the scenario.
Accuracy Checks
- If this field is completed, confirm the non-motorist check box is also indicated.
Other Related Fields
Vulnerable User Condition; Vulnerable User Indicator; Vulnerable User Location; Vulnerable User Type
Data Quality Audit Results
Report Type | Acceptable | Inconsistent | Invalid | Empty | ||||
Local Police (electronic) | 14 | 73.7% | 2 | 10.5% | – | – | 3 | 15.8% |
Local Police (paper) | 8 | 57.1% | 1 | 7.1% | – | – | 5 | 35.7% |
State Police (electronic) | 3 | 100.0% | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Total | 25 | 69.4% | 3 | 8.3% | – | – | 8 | 22.2% |
For the Vulnerable User Action field, the percentage of acceptable completions was 69 percent (25 of 36). While the reports submitted by the State Police were acceptable 100 percent of the time (3 of 3), paper submissions by local police were acceptable just over 57 percent (8 of 13) of the time. The issue with most of these unacceptable reports was that the officer left the field empty 22 percent (8 of 36) of the time.